Guarding Hosts from Parasite Attack – The Rapid Evolution of a Defensive Mutualism

How do organ­isms pro­tect them­selves against harm­ful para­sites? One way might be to form mutu­al­ist­ic rela­tion­ships with microbes who help defend their host. A new study, pub­lished in Evol­u­tion Let­ters, has demon­strated that bene­fi­cial co-depend­ent rela­tion­ships can evolve remark­ably quickly between hosts and bac­teria, with import­ant pos­it­ive effects on host health. Luke Turn­er reports:

Organ­isms inter­act with each oth­er in a vari­ety of ways, and rela­tion­ships that form between the indi­vidu­als of dif­fer­ent spe­cies fall some­where along a gradi­ent known as the para­sit­ism-mutu­al­ism con­tinuum. This scale indic­ates how bene­fi­cial the organ­isms are to each oth­er, with “mutu­al­ism” describ­ing cases where indi­vidu­als provide recip­roc­al bene­fits, while “para­sit­ism” occurs when one organ­ism profits at the expense of the oth­er. These asso­ci­ations are formed through long term co-evol­u­tion­ary inter­ac­tions, but their pos­i­tion on the con­tinuum is dynam­ic and can shift over time if the nature of the rela­tion­ship changes.

When para­sites exploit oth­er organ­isms they must attempt to evade the defences of the host, which evolve in order to pro­tect them from this costly infec­tion. One way in which hosts can defend them­selves from para­sites is through the actions of organ­isms that live with­in them. These micro­bi­al sym­bionts can offer inad­vert­ent pro­tec­tion against vir­u­lent para­sites, with hosts in turn giv­ing the defens­ive microbes a place to sur­vive, there­fore form­ing a defens­ive mutu­al­ism. This rela­tion­ship straddles the para­sit­ism-mutu­al­ism con­tinuum, as defens­ive microbes are costly for their hosts to sus­tain in the absence of a vir­u­lent para­site. There­fore for the host, this defens­ive mutu­al­ism is only worth invest­ing in when they are sus­cept­ible to the infec­tion of a vir­u­lent para­site, and when the micro­bi­al sym­biont can offer effect­ive protection.

Defens­ive mutu­al­isms are wide­spread and have been iden­ti­fied across a num­ber of plant and anim­al spe­cies, includ­ing in humans. These mutu­al­ist­ic host-microbe rela­tion­ships are thought to be the product of long term co-evol­u­tion­ary inter­ac­tions, how­ever little is known about how or why they are ini­ti­ated. The answer to their adapt­ive ori­gin may lie with the fact that hosts are nor­mally infec­ted with a num­ber of dif­fer­ent para­site spe­cies sim­ul­tan­eously. This coin­fec­tion often leads to one para­site spe­cies redu­cing the effect­ive­ness of a com­pet­ing spe­cies, which indir­ectly bene­fits the host by provid­ing pro­tec­tion. As long as the pro­tect­ing para­site is only mildly vir­u­lent, and it is pre­vent­ing a more vir­u­lent para­site from infect­ing the host, this forms the basis for co-evol­u­tion between a host and the micro­bi­al symbiont.

New research car­ried out by Rafaluck-Mohr et al. (2018), pub­lished in Evol­u­tion Let­ters, set out to invest­ig­ate the con­di­tions under which these defens­ive mutu­al­isms emerge. Using an exper­i­ment­al approach, they infec­ted a host, the nem­at­ode Caen­orhab­dit­is eleg­ans, with Entero­coc­cus faecal­is, a costly bac­teri­um that had pre­vi­ously been found to defend the nem­at­ode against a dif­fer­ent, more vir­u­lent para­site (Sta­phyl­o­coc­cus aure­us). Hosts were then exposed to the more vir­u­lent para­site, and the study found that when nem­at­odes were sub­jec­ted to coin­fec­tion by both types of para­site, E. faecal­is evolved to pro­tect them against the more vir­u­lent strain. Con­sequently, the defend­ing bac­teria col­on­ised the nem­at­ode hosts at a great­er rate.

800px-Caenorhabditis_elegans
Caen­orhab­dit­is eleg­ans, the host nem­at­ode used in Rafaluck-Mohr et al.‘s (2018) exper­i­ments. Photo source: https://hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fájl:Caenorhabditis_elegans.jpg

These res­ults indic­ate that the nem­at­ode hosts evolved reduced res­ist­ance to E. faecal­is, due to the sim­ul­tan­eous bene­fits of the rela­tion­ship between host and defens­ive microbe. With the help of a math­em­at­ic­al mod­el, the study sim­u­lated the scen­ario in which two para­sites infect a host. This mod­el shows that when one para­site provides at least an inter­me­di­ate level of pro­tec­tion to the host against a more vir­u­lent para­site, a defens­ive mutu­al­ism can form between host and microbe. Fur­ther­more, the study demon­strates that ongo­ing host-para­site inter­ac­tions are dynam­ic, and can read­ily trans­ition to mutu­ally bene­fi­cial rela­tion­ships if there is a shared enemy in the com­munity (in this case, the more vir­u­lent parasite).

One of the most excit­ing find­ings of this research was the speed with which the mutu­al­ist­ic rela­tion­ships formed. From the time the nem­at­ode hosts were first exposed to the para­sites, it took a max­im­um of 14 host gen­er­a­tions for E. faecal­is to provide heightened pro­tec­tion against the more vir­u­lent S. aure­us. In coe­volu­tion­ary terms this rep­res­ents a rap­id time­frame for this type of inter­ac­tion to arise. Fur­ther­more, these bene­fi­cial defens­ive bac­teria are trans­mit­ted between dif­fer­ent hosts hori­zont­ally, mean­ing that they can pass between indi­vidu­als of the same gen­er­a­tion in real time. These are excit­ing find­ings as they show that there is spe­cif­ic co-adapt­a­tion tak­ing place between the host and the mutu­al­ist­ic parasite.

As one of the first exper­i­ment­al demon­stra­tions of hosts increas­ing their sus­cept­ib­il­ity to the defens­ive sym­biont E. faecal­is, this study shows that hosts can select for micro­bi­al col­on­isa­tion as a defence against oth­er para­sites. Des­pite infec­tion of the sym­biont remain­ing costly to the host, it is worth­while invest­ing in this sym­bi­ot­ic rela­tion­ship when they can provide at least an inter­me­di­ate level of pro­tec­tion. The fact that these asso­ci­ations can form so quickly is encour­aging for the fight against deadly human para­sites such as Zika, as micro­bi­al part­ners have the poten­tial to provide human hosts with pro­tec­tion against their transmission.

 

Luke Turn­er is a MSc Sci­ence Com­mu­nic­a­tion stu­dent at the Uni­ver­sity of Shef­field. The ori­gin­al study is freely avail­able to read and down­load from Evol­u­tion Let­ters here.

Leave a Reply